Candidate Performance Report
Candidate Name: Michael C. Thomas Transcript Id: 2976126
Exam Name: Project Management Certification Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Score: 10
Percentile: 94
Result: Pass
Overall Performance
Passing Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Score
Weak
Average
Above Average
Good
Expert
Sub-scale Performance
Sub-scale Name
Weak

(0-4)
Average

(5)
Above Average
(6)
Good

(7-8)
Expert

(9-10)
Fundamentals of Project Management
Sub-scale score out of 10: 9
Planning Project Quality, Time and Risks
Sub-scale score out of 10: 10
Project Closing
Sub-scale score out of 10: 4
Project Control
Sub-scale score out of 10: 3
Project Execution
Sub-scale score out of 10: 8
Project Initiation
Sub-scale score out of 10: 3
Project Planning and Monitoring
Sub-scale score out of 10: 9
Efficiency
Accuracy
Speed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Accuracy:
The candidate has obtained expert score in accuracy.
Speed:
The candidate has obtained weak score in speed.
Efficiency:
Based on the collective scores of accuracy and speed, the overall efficiency of the candidate is expert.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
Fundamentals of Project Management
Planning Project Quality, Time and Risks
Project Execution
Project Planning and Monitoring
Weaknesses
Project Closing
Project Control
Project Initiation

The results of this test show that Michael C. is suited for job profiles, which require knowledge of Fundamentals of Project Management, Planning Project Quality, Time and Risks, Project Execution, Project Planning and Monitoring as the core competencies. However, he/ she might not be best suited for jobs, which require specific focus on Project Closing, Project Control, Project Initiation.
Job Suitability
The analysis of Michael C.'s performance in this test in terms of speed and accuracy with which he/ she attempted this test reveals that he/ she is exceptionally accurate as compared to other test takers and the time taken for completing the test was very high. If you require a candidate who is exceptionally accurate at understanding problems and drawing accurate inferences, and the job is not time critical, then Michael C. may be shortlisted.
Disclaimer:
The results of this report are intended to serve as general guidelines only and should be used in combination with other recruitment tools such as evaluation of academic performance, employment history, and personality. The candidate’s performance on this test depends on a number of factors and ExpertRating does not guarantee same or similar results in the future or in a different test setting.
Copyright © 2012 ExpertRating Solutions.